Blog

"The CAT ruled in favour of VL on both issues, determining that contractual terms do not restrict exhaustion and that the non-program elements relied upon by Microsoft were ancillary or incidental to the primary computer program, thus not preventing the exhaustion of rights in all elements of the software upon first sale."

Microsoft has failed in its attempt to use copyright and intellectual property law to fend off a £270 million standalone abuse of dominance claim before the UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal.

Judgment of the Tribunal concerning the trial of two preliminary issues in a claim brought by JJH Enterprises Limited (trading as ValueLicensing) against Microsoft.

ValueLicensing dispute probes whether Office counts as a creative work.

Long-running fight between Microsoft and ValueLicensing ramps up again.